Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Caries assessment at enamel threshold vs None (single-group incidence)

Enamel caries proportion · European adolescents aged 15 years

Pooled enamel caries proportion was 0.72 (I² = 99.8%).

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022 All outcomes
Europe · Exact age
Proportion 0.72 [0.55, 0.96]
2 studies
GRADE not reported

Caries assessment at enamel threshold vs None (single-group incidence)

Enamel caries proportion · European adolescents aged 17 years

Pooled enamel caries proportion was 0.58.

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022 All outcomes
Europe · Exact age
Proportion 0.58 [0.55, 0.60]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Caries assessment at enamel threshold vs None (single-group incidence)

Enamel caries proportion · European adolescents aged 12 years

Pooled enamel caries proportion was 0.52 (I² = 100.0%).

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022 All outcomes
Europe · Exact age
Proportion 0.52 [0.36, 0.75]
6 studies
GRADE not reported

Caries assessment at enamel threshold vs None (single-group incidence)

Enamel caries proportion · European adolescents aged 18 years

Pooled enamel caries proportion was 0.29 (I² = 99.3%).

1 finding from 1 review

Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022 All outcomes
Europe · Exact age
Proportion 0.29 [0.22, 0.38]
2 studies
GRADE not reported