Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 16.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 5 · 83.3%High 0 · 0%

Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring

Oxygen desaturation · patients undergoing PSA

Capnography and standard monitoring showed no clear difference in oxygen desaturation compared with standard monitoring (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.89 [0.48, 1.63]
3 studies · 1272 participants
Moderate

Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring

Hypotension · patients undergoing PSA

Capnography and standard monitoring showed no clear difference in hypotension compared with standard monitoring (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.36 [0.98, 5.69]
1 study · 986 participants
Moderate

Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring

Emesis, pulmonary aspiration · patients undergoing PSA

Capnography and standard monitoring showed no clear difference in emesis, pulmonary aspiration compared with standard monitoring (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.1 [0.13, 75.88]
1 study · 986 participants
Moderate

Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring

Airway interventions · patients undergoing PSA

Capnography and standard monitoring showed no clear difference in airway interventions compared with standard monitoring (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.26 [0.94, 1.69]
3 studies · 1272 participants
Moderate

Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring

Airway interventions adult subgroup analysis (aged ≥ 18 years)h · patients undergoing PSA

Capnography and standard monitoring probably leads to higher airway interventions adult subgroup analysis (aged ≥ 18 years)h compared with standard monitoring (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.44 [1.16, 1.79]
2 studies · 1118 participants
Moderate

Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring

Time to recovery · patients undergoing PSA

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found