Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 42.9%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Visual acuity · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

2 findings from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 62 participants
Moderate

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Change in distance BCVA in the amblyopic eye 12 months after cessation of treatment · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Participant adherence to intervention · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Proportion of participants experiencing an adverse event of permanent diplopia (double vision) Reports of diplopia across all measured time points · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Low

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Change in the interocular difference in contrast sensitivity Any validated test, from baseline to 16 (± 2) weeks · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found