Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,929 questions · 15,213 findings · 2,394 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 15,213 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Mifepristone alone vs mifepristone (200 mg) plus prostaglandin

Nausea · women undergoing first trimester abortion

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical methods for first trimester abortion 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mifepristone alone vs mifepristone (200 mg) plus prostaglandin

Women's dissatisfaction with the procedure · women undergoing first trimester abortion

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical methods for first trimester abortion 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mifepristone alone vs mifepristone (200 mg) plus prostaglandin

Blood transfusion · women undergoing first trimester abortion

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical methods for first trimester abortion 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mifepristone (600 mg) plus prostaglandin vs mifepristone (200 mg) plus prostaglandin

Women's dissatisfaction with the procedure · women undergoing first trimester abortion

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical methods for first trimester abortion 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mifepristone (600 mg) plus prostaglandin vs mifepristone (200 mg) plus prostaglandin

Blood transfusion · women undergoing first trimester abortion

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical methods for first trimester abortion 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Misoprostol 800 µg plus mifepristone 200 mg vs mifepristone (200 mg) plus prostaglandin

Blood transfusion · women undergoing first trimester abortion

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical methods for first trimester abortion 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia vs aphakia

Amblyopia ‐ not reported · children younger than two years of age with bilateral congenital cataracts

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for bilateral congenital cataract in children aged two years and under 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia vs aphakia

Retinal detachment ‐ not reported · children younger than two years of age with bilateral congenital cataracts

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for bilateral congenital cataract in children aged two years and under 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia vs aphakia

Reoperation rate ‐ not reported · children younger than two years of age with bilateral congenital cataracts

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for bilateral congenital cataract in children aged two years and under 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prone vs supine

Mortality (respiratory events) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung dependent

Blood gases (PaCO2) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung dependent

Lung function (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung dependent

Oxygenation index (FiO2% X MPAW/PaO2) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung dependent

Episodes of apnoea · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung independent

Mortality (respiratory events) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung independent

Oxygen saturation (SaO2) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung independent

Blood gases (PaCO2) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung independent

Lung function (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung independent

Oxygenation index (FiO2% X MPAW/PaO2) ‐ not reported · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Supine vs good‐lung independent

Episodes of apnoea · acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found