Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,290 questions · 1,309 findings · 571 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,309 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Phenobarbital and opioid vs opioid

Adverse events To discharge · newborn infants with opioid withdrawal

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sedatives for opioid withdrawal in newborn infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phenobarbital vs supportive care

Adverse events To discharge · newborn infants with opioid withdrawal

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Sedatives for opioid withdrawal in newborn infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive foam and gel surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive air surfaces vs reactive water surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive air surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive air surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces

All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive water surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive gel surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive water surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention vs control

Adverse events and symptoms · community‐dwelling adults under 60 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions outside the workplace for reducing sedentary behaviour in adults under 60 years of age 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Operative hysteroscopy vs control

Adverse events ‐ Miscarriage · subfertile women with endometrial polyps diagnosed by ultrasonography prior to treatment with gonadotropin and intrauterine insemination

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Adverse events Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Concomitant (concurrent) chemoradiotherapy vs radical surgery

Adverse events: lymphoedema · women (18 years and older) diagnosed with stage IB2 cervical cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found