Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

515 questions in 19 reviews · cluster CL0076

current versions
No studies 19 · 3.7%Ungraded 449 · 87.2%Very low 17 · 3.3%Low 23 · 4.5%Moderate 7 · 1.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.58 [0.52, 0.65]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 52.3 [44, 60]44 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Tailored meta-analysis (Egypt)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.58 [0.52, 0.65]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
PPV for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
PPV 58.338 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
PPV for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
PPV 82.012 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 36.0 [20, 56]9 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.76 [0.58, 0.99]9 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 9.82 [7.3, 13.3]22 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 90.9 [88, 93]94 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.75 [0.6, 0.94]11 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 95.5 [94, 97]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 38.6 [25, 54]14 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 9.82 [7.3, 13.3]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.54 [0.46, 0.63]36 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
All proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 90.0 [87, 92]38 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.56 [0.46, 0.68]12 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.63 [0.56, 0.72]38 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 80.4 [72, 87]11 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 43.7 [37, 51]50 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 89.3 [86, 92]44 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 95.5 [94, 97]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 2.02 [1.4, 2.9]11 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 64.6 [57, 71]94 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
PPV for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
PPV 32.111 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
NPV for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
NPV 94.336 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
PPV for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
PPV 39.536 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 84.9 [82, 89]55 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
PPV for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
PPV 35.651 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 89.1 [86, 92]38 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 44.4 [38, 51]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 39.7 [25, 56]11 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 5.0 [4.3, 5.8]55 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 44.4 [38, 51]22 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
NPV for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
NPV 97.555 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 75.1 [70, 81]55 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 12.5 [9.2, 16.9]50 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 50.8 [43, 59]36 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Sensitivity for detecting all (initial and advanced) proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 40.5 [33, 48]34 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting all (initial and advanced) proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 92.5 [91, 94]31 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 77.0 [73, 81]51 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.58 [0.52, 0.65]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting advanced proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Germany
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 95.5 [94, 97]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) proximal caries · Proximal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 5.34 [4.2, 6.8]31 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Specificity for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 77.8 [70, 84]14 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Negative LR for detecting advanced occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Negative LR 0.29 [0.2, 0.4]55 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection (ICDAS visual/visual-tactile inspection) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
Positive LR for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 3.46 [2.8, 4.3]67 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Tailored meta-analysis (Egypt)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Sensitivity 44.4 [38, 51]22 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection (bitewing radiography) vs Reference standard (histological validation or cavity/lesion opening; advanced = cavitated/dentin-involved lesions, all = enamel-confined initial lesions also counted)
NPV for detecting all (initial and advanced) occlusal caries · Occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (demonstrated in 12-14 year-olds; underlying diagnostic accuracy studies, mostly… · Tailored to Egypt
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
NPV 85.011 studiesUngraded
Radiographic caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced proximal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Tailored meta-analysis (Egypt)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Positive LR 9.82 [7.3, 13.3]22 studiesUngraded
Visual caries detection vs Reference standard (often histological; also invasive opening)
Advanced occlusal carious lesions · Permanent molar surfaces in diagnostic accuracy studies (mostly in vitro; clinical) · Conventional meta-analysis (all studies)
Visual and radiographic caries detection: a tailored meta-analysis for two different settings, Egypt and… (2018)
Specificity 90.9 [88, 93]94 studiesUngraded