Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

15 questions in 6 reviews · intervention: Pit-and-fissure sealants · outcome domain: Lesion arrest/remineralization

current versions
No studies 6 · 40%Ungraded 6 · 40%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 6.7%Moderate 2 · 13.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Resin-based sealant (proximal sealing / fluoride-releasing resin sealant) vs Non-invasive measures (fluoride varnish; no intervention)
Radiographic progression of proximal caries lesions · Children and adults with non-cavitated proximal (interproximal) caries lesions in primary and/or permanent teeth (ages… · Final follow-up (1 to 3.5 years), Sealant vs non-invasive (Fig. 5, subgroup 2.1.2)
Microinvasive interventions in the management of proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth-… (2025)
OR 0.24 [0.10, 0.55]2 studies · 111 participantsUngraded
Microinvasive techniques (resin infiltration, sealant, glass ionomer) vs Invasive treatment (conventional restorations)
Radiographic progression of proximal caries lesions · Children and adults with non-cavitated proximal (interproximal) caries lesions in primary and/or permanent teeth (ages…
Microinvasive interventions in the management of proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth-… (2025)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Microinvasive techniques (mostly resin infiltration; incl. resin sealant) vs Non-invasive measures (fluoride varnish/toothpaste, flossing, oral hygiene instruction, sham/standard of care)
Radiographic progression of proximal caries lesions · Children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions in permanent teeth (ages 11-45) · Final follow-up (1 to 7 years across trials), Permanent teeth (Fig. 6, subgroup 2.1.1)
Microinvasive interventions in the management of proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth-… (2025)
OR 0.18 [0.10, 0.32]7 studies · 296 participantsUngraded
Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant (fluoride-releasing or non-fluoride-releasing)
Progression of non-cavitated enamel caries · 'Healthy' children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 3-5 years (schools and kindergartens, India and China)
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant
Progression of non-cavitated enamel caries · Children with caries-free second primary molars, aged 4-8 years (dental clinic, Turkey and Spain)
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Autopolymerised sealant vs Light polymerised sealant
Progression of non-cavitated enamel caries · Children with sound primary molars, aged 2-4 years (municipal dental clinics or hospital paediatric clinics, Denmark)
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported on this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant
Progression of non-cavitated enamel caries · Children with caries-free primary first molars (with or without caries on other teeth), aged 1-5 years (paediatric…
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs No sealant (no treatment)
Progression of non-cavitated enamel caries · Children with caries-free or non-cavitated carious lesion primary molars, aged 3-7 years (paediatric department,…
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Sealing (resin sealant, glass ionomer cement, or polyurethane tape) vs Non-invasive/control treatments (flossing, fluoride varnish/toothpaste, or dietary advice; placebo in one trial)
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression · Patients with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions · Longest available follow-up
Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2021)
OR 0.27 [0.18, 0.42]7 studies · 320 participantsModerate
Sealing using sealant materials vs Selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE)
Lesion progression · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious… · Cavitated lesions, primary dentition
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions (2021) · Cochrane
Lesion progression reported narratively: Dias 2018 1/27 sealed vs 1/21 SE at 24 months; Hesse 2014 0/17 sealed vs 0/17 SE at 18 months; not pooled and not GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Sealing using sealant materials vs Non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR)
Lesion progression · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious… · Non-cavitated lesions, primary dentition
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions (2021) · Cochrane
Lesion progression reported narratively: Borges 2012a found 3/26 sealed lesions progressed after 1 year (split-mouth); not pooled and not GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Sealing using sealant materials vs No treatment
Lesion progression · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious… · Non-cavitated lesions, permanent dentition
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions (2021) · Cochrane
Lesion progression reported narratively: da Silveira 2012 found 3/27 lesions progressed after 1 year; not pooled and not GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Resin-modified glass ionomer fissure sealant vs Fluoride varnish
Progression of dentinal carious lesions into enamel or dentine · Children and adolescents from the general population, younger than 20 years of age at the start of the study · 1 year
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of… (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.18 [0.01, 4.27]1 study · 21 participantsUngraded
Sealant vs No treatment
Arrest or reversal of noncavitated approximal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on approximal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth) · 12-36 mo
Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. (2019)
RR 2.41 [1.26, 4.58]6 studies · 565 participantsLow
Sealant vs No treatment
Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth) · 8-12 mo
Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. (2019)
RR 1.98 [1.61, 2.44]7 studies · 1575 participantsModerate