Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Population

Intervention or exposure

Comparison

Outcome

Any field or review title

Field or topic

Source

Review versions

3 questions in 1 reviews · intervention: Pit-and-fissure sealants · outcome domain: Caries (unspecified)

current versions

No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

Question	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) fissure sealants vs Resin-based fissure sealants Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · Sealed permanent teeth · 12 months, 12 months (permanent teeth) The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)	RR 1.66 [0.75, 3.68]	5 studies · 1952 participants	Ungraded
Conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) fissure sealants vs Resin-based fissure sealants Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · Sealed permanent teeth · 6 months, 6 months (permanent teeth) The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)	RR 2.04 [0.62, 6.70]	6 studies · 1944 participants	Ungraded
Conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) fissure sealants vs Resin-based fissure sealants Caries occurrence on sealed teeth · Sealed permanent teeth · 24 months, 24 months (permanent teeth) The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin… (2013)	RR 1.51 [1.00, 2.28]	8 studies · 2810 participants	Ungraded