evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,811 questions · 70,850 findings · 5,139 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 15,174 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 6,479 · 9.1%Very low 17,330 · 24.5%Low 17,814 · 25.1%Moderate 11,056 · 15.6%High 2,997 · 4.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse event ‐ multiple pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: multiple pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse events: ectopic pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: ectopic pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

ED visits · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in emergency department (ED) visits: proportion of residents with at… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Unplanned admission to hospital · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care may leads to lower unplanned hospital admissions: proportion of residents with at least… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Falls · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Any alternative model of care changes adverse events/falls: proportion of residents with a fall at longest compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Adherence to clinical guideline‐recommended care: proportion of residents with adequate antidepressant therapy at longest · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Any alternative model of care changes adherence to clinical guideline‐recommended care: proportion of… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Differences in quality of life ( · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Has died · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in mortality: proportion of residents who died at longest compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions vs control

Mental well‐being at · promoting the mental health of people living in LMICs affected by humanitarian crises (children)
2 findings from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions vs control

Functioning at · promoting the mental health of people living in LMICs affected by humanitarian crises (children)
2 findings from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions vs control

Prosocial behaviour at · promoting the mental health of people living in LMICs affected by humanitarian crises (children)
2 findings from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions vs control

Mental well‐being at · promoting the mental health of people living in LMICs affected by humanitarian crises (adults)
2 findings from 1 review