Intervention not reported
Number of participants with improved quality of life · children with chronic constipation
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of participants with improved quality of life (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Self‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using Peds QL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Parent‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation
1 finding from 1 review
Short‐term mortality · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
It is very uncertain whether enhanced recovery protocol changes short‐term mortality compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (proportion) · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
It is very uncertain whether enhanced recovery protocol changes serious adverse events (proportion) compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (number) · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
It is very uncertain whether enhanced recovery protocol changes serious adverse events (number) compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (until 3 months) · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events mild adverse events · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
Enhanced recovery protocol may leads to lower mild adverse events (proportion) compared with standard care (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
RR 0.58 [0.39, 0.85]
4 studies · 525 participants
Low
Rate ratio 0.52 [0.39, 0.7]
9 studies · 1014 participants
Low
Length of hospital stay · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Patient readmissions · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
It is very uncertain whether enhanced recovery protocol changes readmissions compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Costs · people with major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Short‐term mortality · people with necrotising pancreatitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Organ failure · people with necrotising pancreatitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse events (number) · people with necrotising pancreatitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Peritoneal lavage vs. open necrosectomy · people with necrotising pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes peritoneal lavage vs. open necrosectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Minimally invasive step‐up approach vs. open necrosectomy · people with necrotising pancreatitis
The intervention may leads to lower minimally invasive step‐up approach vs. open necrosectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Minimally invasive step‐up approach: video‐assisted vs. endoscopic · people with necrotising pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes minimally invasive step‐up approach: video‐assisted vs. endoscopic (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Peritoneal lavage vs. open necrosectomy · people with necrotising pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes peritoneal lavage vs. open necrosectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Minimally invasive step‐up approach vs. open necrosectomy · people with necrotising pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes minimally invasive step‐up approach vs. open necrosectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Delayed open necrosectomy vs. early open necrosectomy · people with necrotising pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes delayed open necrosectomy vs. early open necrosectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review