Intervention not reported
TUG · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in TUG (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
6MWT · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention may leads to higher 6MWT (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to 36), POMA (range 0 to 30). · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0 to 20), BI (range 0 to 100), FIM (range 18 to 126), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates better functioning. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Number of people who returned to living at pre‐fracture residence · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in number of people who returned to living at pre‐fracture residence (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility outcome · adults following hip fracture surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to 36), EMS (range 0 to 20), BBS (range 0 to 56), PPME (range 0 to 12), Koval (range 1 to 7). Higher values indicate better mobility (except MILA and Koval, where scale was inverted f... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) · adults with fractures of the distal femur
1 finding from 1 review
PROMs (long term) Measurements: SMFA (range 0–100, higher values indicate worse function) KSS (range 0–100, where higher values indicate better function) · adults with fractures of the distal femur
1 finding from 1 review
Direct adverse events (reoperation): we report reoperation for removal of implant as this is the most clinically relevant. Other adverse events with data included: loss of fixation, superficial infection, deep infection, haematoma formation, impla... · adults with fractures of the distal femur
It is very uncertain whether retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN) changes direct adverse events (reoperation): we report reoperation for… compared with locking plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · adults with fractures of the distal femur
2 findings from 1 review
Pain · adults with fractures of the distal femur
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners sustaining a lower‐limb running injurya ( · healthy adults participating in recreational running
Neutral / cushioned showed no clear difference in number of runners sustaining a lower‐limb running injurya ( compared with minimalist running shoes (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Runner satisfaction with footwear · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners requiring hospital admission or surgery, or both, for musculoskeletal injury or adverse event · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found