Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,497 questions · 1,590 findings · 129 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 281 · 17.7%GRADE not reported 74 · 4.7%Very low 410 · 25.8%Low 420 · 26.4%Moderate 280 · 17.6%High 125 · 7.9%

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ adults

All‐cause mortality · Adult patients with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

Outpatients showed no clear difference in mortality compared with inpatients ‐ adults (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.04 [0.29, 3.71]
6 studies · 628 participants
Moderate

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ adults

Fever clearance time · Adult patients with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 169 participants
Low

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ adults

Adverse drug reactions · Adult patients with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

Outpatients showed no clear difference in adverse drugs reactions compared with inpatients ‐ adults (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 8.39 [0.38, 187.15]
3 studies · 375 participants
Low

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ adults

Duration of neutropaenia (days) · Adult patients with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 169 participants
Low

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ adults

Length of hospitalisation (days) · Adult patients with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 251 participants
Low

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ children

Treatment failure · Children with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

Outpatients showed no clear difference in treatment failure compared with inpatients ‐ children (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.04 [0.55, 1.99]
4 studies · 366 participants
Moderate

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ children

All‐cause mortality · Children with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

Outpatients showed no clear difference in mortality compared with inpatients ‐ children (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.63 [0.15, 2.7]
3 studies · 329 participants
Moderate

Outpatient vs inpatients ‐ children

Fever clearance time · Children with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event

1 finding from 1 review

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low‐risk febrile neutropaenic event 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 305 participants
Low

Dietary interventions vs control

All‐cause mortality · people living beyond cancer

Dietary intervention showed no clear difference in mortality compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 0.98 [0.77, 1.23]
1 study · 3107 participants
Low

Dietary interventions vs control

Secondary cancers · people living beyond cancer

Dietary intervention showed no clear difference in secondary cancers compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.99 [0.84, 1.15]
1 study · 3107 participants
Low

Dietary interventions vs control

Children's fruit and vegetable intake (servings/d) Measured by food frequency questionnaire · people living beyond cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 834 participants
Moderate

Dietary interventions vs control

Fibre intake assessed as g · people living beyond cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 3127 participants
Very low

Dietary interventions vs control

Diet quality · people living beyond cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 747 participants
Moderate

Dietary interventions vs control

Body‐mass index (BMI) · people living beyond cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 777 participants
Moderate

Dietary interventions vs control

Waist‐to‐hip circumference assessed as cm · people living beyond cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 106 participants
Low

Robot‐assisted surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery

Intraoperative and postoperative complications · women undergoing hysterectomy

Robot‐assisted surgery showed no clear difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.92 [0.54, 1.59]
6 studies · 585 participants
Low

Robot‐assisted surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery

Operating time · gynaecology

1 finding from 1 review

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 186 participants
Low

Robot‐assisted surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery

Length of hospital stay · gynaecology

1 finding from 1 review

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 108 participants
Very low

Robot‐assisted surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery

Blood transfusion · gynaecology

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Robot‐assisted surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery

Intraoperative complications · women undergoing hysterectomy

Robot‐assisted surgery showed no clear difference in intraoperative complications compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.05 [0.31, 3.56]
5 studies · 487 participants
Low