Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall postoperative morbidity · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in overall postoperative morbidity (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reoperation rate · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention may leads to lower reoperation rate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes total length of hospital stay (days) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative mortality · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative mortality (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Outcomes after 1‐ to 2‐year · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
False‐positive rate · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher false‐positive rate compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
False‐negative rate · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of biopsies · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher rate of biopsies compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Outcomes after 1‐ to 2‐year · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts: cohort studies · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts: RCT compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Incremental detection of invasive cancers · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in incremental detection of invasive cancers compared with mammography alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Interval cancer · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in interval cancer compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
False‐positive rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher false‐positive rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
False‐negative rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Breast Cancer‐related Death · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found