Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,860 questions · 64,864 findings · 4,913 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 13,869 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 3,491 · 5.4%Very low 16,300 · 25.1%Low 17,338 · 26.7%Moderate 10,900 · 16.8%High 2,966 · 4.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

McKenzie therapy vs minimal intervention

Disability (intermediate‐term) RMDQ. Scale from: 0 to 24. · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 180 participants
Low

McKenzie therapy vs minimal intervention

Adverse events · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

McKenzie therapy vs manual therapy

Pain intensity various scales short‐term · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 298 participants
Low

McKenzie therapy vs manual therapy

Pain: intermediate‐term · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 235 participants
Low

McKenzie therapy vs manual therapy

Disability Multiple scales (0 to 100) Short‐term · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 298 participants
Low

McKenzie therapy vs manual therapy

Disability (intermediate‐term) RMDQ. Scale from: 0 to 24. · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 235 participants
Low

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Time (days) to achieve exclusive oral feeding · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 292 participants
Very low

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Time (days) spent in NICU ‐ not reported · preterm infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Length of hospital stay · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 249 participants
Very low

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Duration (days) of parenteral nutrition ‐ not reported · preterm infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention

Time (days) to achieve exclusive oral feeding · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
10 studies · 574 participants
Very low

Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention

Time (days) spent in NICU ‐ not reported · preterm infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention

Length of hospital stay · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
10 studies · 591 participants
Low

Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention

Duration (days) of parenteral nutrition · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 268 participants
Very low

Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities

Specific behaviour ‐ agitation · people with dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 485 participants
Low

Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities

Quality of life (self‐rating by the participants; · people with dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 42 participants
Low

Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities

Quality of life (proxy‐rating; · people with dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 177 participants
Low

Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities

Adverse events; · people with dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 188 participants
GRADE not reported

Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities

Positive affect ( · people with dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 498 participants
Very low

Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities

Negative affect ( · people with dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 632 participants
Moderate