Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives: addition of monetary reward changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Non‐monetary incentives: addition of pen showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether maintaining participant engagement: newsletter changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Maintaining participant engagement: post‐it note showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether behavioural interventions: theory informed cover letter changes retention [ compared with usual cover letter (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether impact of recruitment: optimised information changes retention [ compared with standard information (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Questionnaire design: addition of diary to usual follow‐up probably leads to lower retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether data collection location and method: telephone follow‐up changes retention [ compared with postal questionnaire (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
The intervention showed no clear difference in retention [ (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Reminders: electronic reminder showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether prompts: Electronic prompt changes retention [ compared with no prompt (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether prompts: Telephone prompt changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Prompts: personalised prompt showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Monetary incentives: addition of monetary incentives may leads to higher retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Combined outcome of proportion of participants with major or critical monitoring findings · clinical trials in all fields of health care
Risk‐based showed no clear difference in combined outcome of proportion of participants with major or… compared with extensive on‐site monitoring (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Impact of the monitoring strategy on participant recruitment · clinical trials in all fields of health care
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Impact of the monitoring strategy on · clinical trials in all fields of health care
It is very uncertain whether central and local monitoring only changes impact of the monitoring strategy on compared with central and local monitoring with on‐site visits (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Effect of the monitoring strategy on resource use Cost attributed to on‐site monitoring (including visits for‐cause: 4 in on‐site group; 6 in the no on‐site group) · clinical trials in all fields of health care
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Monitoring findings · clinical trials in all fields of health care
1 finding from 1 review
Impact of the monitoring strategy on participant recruitment · clinical trials in all fields of health care
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found