Alarm vs tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)
Proportion of children with adverse events · children with nocturnal enuresis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsGRADE not reported
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
1,014 questions · 1,050 findings · 42 reviews · Incontinence
No studies found 391 · 37.2%GRADE not reported 82 · 7.8%Very low 199 · 19%Low 206 · 19.6%Moderate 150 · 14.3%High 22 · 2.1%
Alarm vs control or no treatment
Proportion of children with adverse events · children with nocturnal enuresis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Alarm vs miscellaneous treatments
Mean number of wet nights a week · children with nocturnal enuresis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsVery low
Alarm vs miscellaneous treatments
Proportion of children achieving 14 consecutive dry nights by the end of treatment · children with nocturnal enuresis
It is very uncertain whether alarm changes proportion of children achieving 14 consecutive dry nights by the… compared with miscellaneous treatments (very low certainty).
4 findings from 1 review
- RR 0.84 [0.55, 1.29]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
- RR 3.62 [1.38, 9.5]2 studies · 116 participantsVery low
- RR 3 [1.41, 6.39]1 study · 96 participantsVery low
Show 1 more finding
- RR 23 [3.19, 165.98]1 study · 150 participantsVery low
Alarm vs miscellaneous treatments
Proportion of children dry at · children with nocturnal enuresis
It is very uncertain whether alarm changes proportion of children dry at compared with miscellaneous treatments (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- RR 0.48 [0.25, 0.92]1 study · 33 participantsVery low
- RR 3 [1.18, 7.6]1 study · 96 participantsVery low
Alarm vs miscellaneous treatments
Proportion of children adverse events · children with nocturnal enuresis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Alarm plus other intervention vs other interventions
Mean number of wet nights a week · children with nocturnal enuresis
2 findings from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 156 participantsLow
Alarm plus other intervention vs other interventions
Proportion of children achieving 14 consecutive dry nights by the end of treatment · children with nocturnal enuresis
It is very uncertain whether alarm plus other intervention changes proportion of children achieving 14 consecutive dry nights by the… compared with other intervention (very low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
- RR 3 [0.73, 12.27]1 study · 22 participantsVery low
- RR 3.79 [1.85, 7.77]1 study · 80 participantsLow
- RR 1.32 [1.08, 1.62]5 studies · 359 participantsLow
Alarm vs placebo drug
Mean number of wet nights a week · children with nocturnal enuresis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsVery low
Alarm plus other intervention vs other interventions
Proportion of children dry at · children with nocturnal enuresis
Alarm plus other intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of children dry at compared with other intervention (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- RR 0.56 [0.15, 2.12]1 study · 80 participantsLow
- RR 2.33 [1.26, 4.29]2 studies · 161 participantsLow
Alarm plus other intervention vs other interventions
Proportion of children with adverse events · children with nocturnal enuresis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsGRADE not reported
Alarm vs placebo drug
Proportion of children achieving 14 consecutive dry nights by the end of treatment · children with nocturnal enuresis
Alarm may leads to higher proportion of children achieving 14 consecutive dry nights by the… compared with placebo drug (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.59 [1.16, 2.17]2 studies · 181 participantsLow
Alarm vs placebo drug
Proportion of children dry at · children with nocturnal enuresis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Alarm vs placebo drug
Proportion of children with adverse events · children with nocturnal enuresis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsGRADE not reported
Any pessary vs control, waiting list or no active treatment
Perceived resolution of prolapse symptoms ≥ 12 months · pelvic organ prolapse in women
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Any pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
Improvement or cure of associated sexual symptoms · pelvic organ prolapse in women
1 finding from 1 review
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsLow
Any pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
Psychological outcome measures at ≥ 12 months · pelvic organ prolapse in women
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Any pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
Number of women with adverse events · pelvic organ prolapse in women
Any pessary may leads to higher number of women with adverse events compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 75.25 [4.7, 1205.45]1 study · 97 participantsLow
PFMT added to continence pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
Perceived resolution of prolapse symptoms ≥ 12 months · pelvic organ prolapse in women
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
PFMT added to continence pessary vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
Patients perceived improvement in symptoms of prolapse assessed using validated symptom questionnaire at 1 year ‐ not reported · pelvic organ prolapse in women
Pessary plus PFMT probably leads to higher perceived improvement of prolapse symptoms compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 2.15 [1.58, 2.94]1 study · 260 participantsModerate