What do systematic reviews say?

Silicone gel sheeting vs pressure garments

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs silicone gel

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs topical onion extract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs polyurethane

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs self‐adhesive propylene glycol and hydroxyethyl cellulose sheeting

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs Gecko Nanoplast

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Silicone gel sheeting vs no silicone gel sheeting

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Compression bandages or stockings vs no compression stockings

• Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 486 participants
  Very low

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces

• Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1 participants
  Moderate

Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs reactive foam and gel surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Foam surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces

• Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1 participants
  Moderate

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Reactive air surfaces vs reactive water surfaces

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found