Question · asked by 1 review
Gabapentin vs amitriptyline: Patient Global Impression of Change much or very much improved
- Population
- children and adolescents with chronic non‐cancer pain
- Intervention
- Gabapentin
- Comparison
- amitriptyline
- Outcome
- Patient Global Impression of Change much or very much improved
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Gabapentin vs amitriptyline Patient Global Impression of Change: much improved or very much improved · children and adolescents (birth to 17 years of age) with chronic non‐cancer pain The review found no eligible studies for this question. Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non‐cancer pain in children and adolescents (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non‐cancer pain in children and adolescents 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Gabapentin vs placebo · people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy · 1 review
- Gabapentin vs placebo · adults with postherpetic neuralgia · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.