Question · asked by 1 review
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs No biomimetic remineralization (control): Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa)
- Population
- Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)
- Intervention
- Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
- Comparison
- No biomimetic remineralization (control)
- Outcome
- Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa)
Only one in vitro study assessed a Self-Etch adhesive with the biological ACAD protocol; it was insufficient for network meta-analysis, so no pooled effect estimate is available (ungraded).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluoride agent (silver diamine fluoride, SDF) vs No biomimetic remineralization (control) Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro) · 24 h (immediate), In vitro; extracted permanent human teeth; bond strength testing (SBS/microSBS/microTBS), Self-Etch + biological ACAD Only one in vitro study assessed a Self-Etch adhesive with the biological ACAD protocol; it was insufficient for network meta-analysis, so no pooled effect estimate is available (ungraded). Biomimetic Remineralization Strategies for Dentin Bond Stability-Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. (2025) All outcomes | Only 1 in vitro study (de Siqueira et al., 2020) assessed Self-Etch adhesive with biological ACAD; insufficient to perform a network meta-analysis, so no pooled estimate is reported. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biomimetic Remineralization Strategies for Dentin Bond Stability-Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. 2025 All outcomes | June 2023 | 23 | Low / Moderate |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.