Question · asked by 1 review
Perioperative infraorbital nerve block vs Infiltration of the incision (peri-incisional infiltration): Pain measured by valid instruments (mean postoperative pain score)
- Population
- Children up to 13 years of age, undergoing cleft lip repair surgery
- Intervention
- Perioperative infraorbital nerve block
- Comparison
- Infiltration of the incision (peri-incisional infiltration)
- Outcome
- Pain measured by valid instruments (mean postoperative pain score)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Perioperative infraorbital nerve block vs Infiltration of the incision (peri-incisional infiltration) Pain measured by valid instruments · Children up to 13 years of age, undergoing cleft lip repair surgery Infraorbital nerve block for postoperative pain following cleft lip repair in children (2016) · Cochrane All outcomes | No numeric data available; one study reported difference favouring control group only at 6 hours postoperatively. One study reported that children in the intervention group had lower pain scores between 1 and 8 hours… | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infraorbital nerve block for postoperative pain following cleft lip repair in children 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2015-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Perioperative infraorbital nerve block vs Placebo (sham/placebo device) · Children up to 13 years of age, undergoing cleft lip repair surgery · 1 review
- Perioperative infraorbital nerve block vs Intravenous analgesia · Children up to 13 years of age, undergoing cleft lip repair surgery · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.