Minimal invasive discectomy vs micro/discectomy: Side effects ‐ surgical site and other infections > 6 months'
Minimal invasive discectomy probably leads to lower side effects ‐ surgical site and other infections > 6 months' compared with micro/discectomy (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Minimal invasive discectomy vs micro/discectomy Side effects ‐ surgical site and other infections > 6 months' · participants with lumbar disc herniation Minimal invasive discectomy probably leads to lower side effects ‐ surgical site and other infections > 6 months' compared with micro/discectomy (moderate certainty). Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.79] | 6 studies · 931 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.