Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: ACBT vs OD: Personal preference
- Population
- adults and children with cystic fibrosis
- Intervention
- Summary of findings: ACBT
- Comparison
- OD
- Outcome
- Personal preference
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: ACBT vs OD Personal preference · people with cystic fibrosis Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 6 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Summary of findings: ACBT vs CCPT · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
- Summary of findings: ACBT vs other breathing techniques · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
- Summary of findings: ACBT vs PEP mask therapy · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
- Summary of findings: ACBT vs exercise · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.