Question · asked by 1 review
Electrostimulation (device) vs Placebo (sham/placebo device): Patient satisfaction with treatment
- Population
- Adults with dry mouth due to Sjogren's Syndrome
- Intervention
- Electrostimulation (device)
- Comparison
- Placebo (sham/placebo device)
- Outcome
- Patient satisfaction with treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Electrostimulation (device) vs Placebo (sham/placebo device) Patient satisfaction with treatment · Adults with dry mouth due to Sjogren's Syndrome The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non‐pharmacological interventions (2013) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD009603.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Electrostimulation (device) vs Placebo (sham/placebo device) Patient satisfaction with treatment · Adults with dry mouth due to Sjogren's Syndrome The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non‐pharmacological interventions (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non‐pharmacological interventions 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2013-04 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Electrostimulation (device) vs Placebo / no treatment / another active non-systemic treatment (e.g. topical salivary stimulant) · People seeking treatment for symptoms of dry mouth (xerostomia) due to any cause (e.g.… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.