Question · asked by 1 review

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham: Urinary tract infection

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation showed no clear difference in other adverse event: urinary tract infection compared with no treatment/sham treatment (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Other adverse event: urinary tract infection · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation showed no clear difference in other adverse event: urinary tract infection compared with no treatment/sham treatment (low certainty).
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.24, 3.86]1 study · 173 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.