Question · asked by 1 review
CPP-ACP enamel pre-treatment for remineralization of white spot lesions before bonding metallic orthodontic brackets vs No enamel pre-treatment before bonding, or treatment with another material: Shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic orthodontic brackets
- Population
- Demineralized enamel of extracted permanent human teeth
- Intervention
- CPP-ACP enamel pre-treatment for remineralization of white spot lesions before bonding metallic orthodontic brackets
- Comparison
- No enamel pre-treatment before bonding, or treatment with another material
- Outcome
- Shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic orthodontic brackets
When used to remineralize white spot lesions on demineralized enamel, CPP-ACP pre-treatment did not significantly affect shear bond strength (MD 1.501, 95% CI -0.630 to 3.632; ungraded).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CPP-ACP enamel pre-treatment for remineralization of white spot lesions before bonding metallic orthodontic brackets vs No enamel pre-treatment before bonding, or treatment with another material Shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic orthodontic brackets · Demineralized enamel of extracted permanent human teeth · Before bonding, In vitro (laboratory), Remineralization of WSLs (demineralized enamel) When used to remineralize white spot lesions on demineralized enamel, CPP-ACP pre-treatment did not significantly affect shear bond strength (MD 1.501, 95% CI -0.630 to 3.632; ungraded). Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with CPP-ACP: a systematic review and… (2023) All outcomes | MD 1.501 [-0.630, 3.632] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with CPP-ACP: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro… 2023 All outcomes | 29 March 2023 (from inception of each database to 29 March 2023) | 15 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.