Question · asked by 1 review
Mobile clinical decision‐support system vs usual care: Health‐related patient behaviours
- Population
- healthcare providers using clinical decision‐support tools and patients receiving care from such providers
- Intervention
- Mobile clinical decision‐support system
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Health‐related patient behaviours
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mobile clinical decision‐support system vs standard care Patients' or clients' health behaviour · healthcare providers using clinical decision‐support tools and patients receiving care from such providers Decision‐support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 2086 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision‐support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.