Question · asked by 1 review

Oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) vs No treatment or saline or water: Necrotising enterocolitis

It is very uncertain whether oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) changes incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) compared with control (water, saline, or no intervention) (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) vs control (water, saline, or no intervention)
Incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) · preterm infants
It is very uncertain whether oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) changes incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) compared with control (water, saline, or no intervention) (very low certainty).
Oropharyngeal colostrum in preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.42 [0.5, 4.02]6 studies · 335 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oropharyngeal colostrum in preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.