Question · asked by 1 review

Intermittent 'as needed' ICS vs daily ICS: Number of participants experiencing one or more episode requiring treatment with oral steroids

Intermittent 'as needed' ICS showed no clear difference in patients with 1 or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids… compared with daily ICS (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Intermittent 'as needed' ICS vs daily ICS
Patients with 1 or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (duration 12 to 52 weeks) · Children and adults with persistent asthma.
Intermittent 'as needed' ICS showed no clear difference in patients with 1 or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids… compared with daily ICS (low certainty).
Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.87, 1.32]7 studies · 1204 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults
2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.