Question · asked by 0 reviews

Visual examination (VE) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative): Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD

Population
Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms, attending an organised screening programme or screened during attendance at a dental or other clinical practice examination
Intervention
Visual examination (VE)
Comparison
Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)
Outcome
Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Conventional oral examination (COE)/visual inspection vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)
Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms, attending an organised screening programme or screened during…
Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in… (2013) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD010173.PUB2, superseded
Summary of findings 1 (no pooled analysis): specificity around 0.98 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00) up to 0.99 (95% CI 0.99 to 0.99) for the eight low-prevalence studies; 0.81 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.83) for one study at 21.6%…10 studies · 25568 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2020-10Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.