Cognitive behaviour therapy + treatment‐as‐usual vs usual care: Physical aggression
Cognitive behaviour therapy + treatment‐as‐usual showed no clear difference in aggression (any act of physical aggression) Assessed by: number… compared with treatment‐as‐usual alone (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive behaviour therapy + treatment‐as‐usual vs treatment‐as‐usual alone Aggression (any act of physical aggression) Assessed by: number reporting any act of physical aggression · adults with antisocial personality disorder Cognitive behaviour therapy + treatment‐as‐usual showed no clear difference in aggression (any act of physical aggression) Assessed by: number… compared with treatment‐as‐usual alone (low certainty). Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.92 [0.28, 3.07] | 1 study · 52 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.