Question · asked by 1 review

Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment: Severity of white spot lesions (surface area and depth)

Population
Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries)
Intervention
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners)
Comparison
Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment
Outcome
Severity of white spot lesions (surface area and depth)

White spot lesion severity was assessed narratively in a small number of studies and not meta-analyzed; evidence is limited (ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Severity of white spot lesions (surface area and depth) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Baseline to end of treatment (varying), University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries)
White spot lesion severity was assessed narratively in a small number of studies and not meta-analyzed; evidence is limited (ungraded).
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
Not meta-analyzed. 2 RCTs assessed WSL severity by lesion surface area (Albhaisi 2020 [12]; Alshatti 2017 [31]) and 1 (Albhaisi 2020 [12]) also by lesion depth; reported narratively with differing methods, generally…2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared to fixed orthodontic treatment.…
2023 All outcomes
May 2023 (searched January 2022 to May 2023; literature 1990-May 2023)14Critically Low / Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.