Question · asked by 1 review
Training to respond to intimate partner violence vs no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers' attitudes towards, knowledge of and readiness to manage IPV, referrals: Healthcare providers’ attitudes/beliefs towards IPV
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Training to respond to intimate partner violence vs no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers' attitudes towards, knowledge of and readiness to manage IPV, referrals Healthcare providers’ attitudes/beliefs towards IPV · physicians/doctors, medical staff, medical students, residents, nurses and nursing students, dentists and dental… Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 641 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.