Question · asked by 0 reviews
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste alone: Caries increment in permanent teeth
- Population
- Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
- Intervention
- Fluoride varnish
- Comparison
- Fluoride toothpaste alone
- Outcome
- Caries increment in permanent teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth (planned primary outcome) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year The review found no eligible studies for this question. One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2000) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD002780, superseded | Protocol only: planned comparison of fluoride varnish versus fluoride toothpaste (Objective 4, toothpaste vs other TFT); no studies included at protocol stage. | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing dental caries in children and… 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2001-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride mouthrinse · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · 1 review
- Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride gel · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · 1 review
- Fluoride varnish vs placebo · Children or adolescents · 1 review
- Fluoride varnish vs no treatment · Children or adolescents · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.