Question · asked by 1 review
Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy: Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia
- Population
- Participants with rosacea
- Intervention
- Pulsed dye laser
- Comparison
- intense pulsed light therapy
- Outcome
- Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia 5‐point Likert scale · Participants with rosacea Interventions for rosacea (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 40 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.