Question · asked by 1 review

Ventilation tubes vs myringotomy: Presence/persistence of OME

Population
children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
Intervention
Ventilation tubes
Comparison
myringotomy
Outcome
Presence/persistence of OME

It is very uncertain whether ventilation tubes changes presence/persistence of OME *Ventilation tubes versus laser… compared with myringotomy (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Ventilation tubes vs myringotomy
Presence/persistence of OME *Ventilation tubes versus laser myringotomy, randomised by ear (6 months ‐ medium‐term) Assumed CC of 0.5 № of participants: 272 (1 RCT) · children aged 6 months to 12 years with OME
It is very uncertain whether ventilation tubes changes presence/persistence of OME *Ventilation tubes versus laser… compared with myringotomy (very low certainty).
Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.27 [0.19, 0.38]Not reportedVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.