Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Mindfulness based on positive behaviour support vs positive behaviour support: Quality of life ‐ not measured
- Population
- outwardly aggressive behaviour in people with intellectual disability
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Mindfulness based on positive behaviour support
- Comparison
- positive behaviour support
- Outcome
- Quality of life ‐ not measured
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Mindfulness based on positive behaviour support vs positive behaviour support Quality of life ‐ not measured · outwardly aggressive behaviour in people with intellectual disability The review found no eligible studies for this question. Behavioural and cognitive‐behavioural interventions for outwardly directed aggressive behaviour in people… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioural and cognitive‐behavioural interventions for outwardly directed aggressive behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.