Question · asked by 1 review
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device: Removal of broken (fractured) instruments from the root canal
- Population
- Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment
- Intervention
- Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes)
- Comparison
- Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
- Outcome
- Removal of broken (fractured) instruments from the root canal
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device Removal of broken (fractured) instruments from the root canal · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment The review found no eligible studies for this question. Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes | No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed. | Not reported | No studies found |
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device Removal of broken (fractured) instruments from the root canal · Patients who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment The review found no eligible studies for this question. Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2009) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD005969.PUB2, superseded | No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed. | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnification devices for endodontic therapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2015-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device · Patients who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 4 years after… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.