Question · asked by 1 review

Facemask with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) vs Tongue appliance: ANB

Population
Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Intervention
Facemask with rapid maxillary expansion (RME)
Comparison
Tongue appliance
Outcome
ANB

Facemask with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) showed no clear difference in ANB compared with tongue appliance; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Facemask with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) vs Tongue appliance
ANB · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) · End of treatment
Facemask with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) showed no clear difference in ANB compared with tongue appliance; GRADE not reported.
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children (2024) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.60 [-1.41, 0.21]1 study · 47 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children
2024 · Cochrane All outcomes
2023-01Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.