Question · asked by 1 review

Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone: Caesarean section ‐ ST analysis

Population
Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring
Intervention
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG)
Comparison
CTG alone
Outcome
Caesarean section ‐ ST analysis

Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography (CTG) vs CTG alone
Caesarean section ‐ ST analysis · Pregnant women (and their fetuses) in labour, with a perceived need for continuous electronic fetal heart rate…
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.02 [0.96, 1.08]6 studies · 26446 participantsHigh

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.