Question · asked by 1 review

Pyrethroid‐like indoor residual spraying (IRS) + insecticide‐treated nets (ITNs) vs ITNs alone: Malaria parasite prevalence

Pyrethroid‐like indoor residual spraying (IRS) + insecticide‐treated… showed no clear difference in malaria parasite prevalence compared with ITNs alone (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Pyrethroid‐like indoor residual spraying (IRS) + insecticide‐treated nets (ITNs) vs ITNs alone
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
Pyrethroid‐like indoor residual spraying (IRS) + insecticide‐treated… showed no clear difference in malaria parasite prevalence compared with ITNs alone (moderate certainty).
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide‐treated nets (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.11 [0.86, 1.44]10820 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide‐treated nets
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.