Question · asked by 1 review

Anti‐leukaemic therapy plus alemtuzumab vs anti‐leukaemic therapy without alemtuzumab (anti‐leukaemic therapy not identical: Treament related mortality

Anti‐leukaemic therapy with alemtuzumab showed no clear difference in treament related mortality compared with anti‐leukaemic therapy without alemtuzumab (anti‐leukaemic therapy… (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Anti‐leukaemic therapy with alemtuzumab vs anti‐leukaemic therapy without alemtuzumab (anti‐leukaemic therapy not identical
Treament related mortality · patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
Anti‐leukaemic therapy with alemtuzumab showed no clear difference in treament related mortality compared with anti‐leukaemic therapy without alemtuzumab (anti‐leukaemic therapy… (low certainty).
Alemtuzumab for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.2 [0.66, 15.5]2 studies · 177 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Alemtuzumab for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.