Question · asked by 1 review
Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth: Quality of life
- Population
- Children (80% aged <= 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth)
- Intervention
- Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth
- Comparison
- Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth
- Outcome
- Quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 3 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth Quality of life · Children (80% aged <= 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth Quality of life · Children (80% aged <= 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children (2017) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD005972.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth Quality of life · Children (80% aged <= 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children (2012) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD005972.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs No treatment (or delayed treatment) · Children (80% aged <= 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and… · 1 review
- Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs No treatment (or delayed treatment) · Children (aged < 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and… · 0 reviews
- Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of permanent teeth · Children (aged < 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.