Question · asked by 1 review
Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + particulate autogenous bone: Major complications at the implant/donor site
- Population
- Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)
- Intervention
- Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration)
- Comparison
- Resorbable barrier + particulate autogenous bone
- Outcome
- Major complications at the implant/donor site
Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) led to lower major complications at the implant/donor site compared with resorbable barrier + autogenous bone; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone Major complications at the implant/donor site · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) led to lower major complications at the implant/donor site compared with resorbable barrier + autogenous bone; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes | Four complications occurred: two dehiscences in the resorbable group; one abscess and one dehiscence in the resorbable + autogenous bone group; none in the non-resorbable group. No statistically significant differences… | 1 study · 25 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate‐delayed and delayed implants) 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2010-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.