Question · asked by 1 review
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator: Restoration survival
- Population
- Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities
- Intervention
- High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations
- Comparison
- No comparator
- Outcome
- Restoration survival
The pooled survival rate was 41% at 2 years.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities · 2 years, School, multiple-surface permanent posterior teeth, 2 years The pooled survival rate was 41% at 2 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Survival percentage 41 [18, 67] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities · 1 year, School, multiple-surface permanent posterior teeth, 1 year The pooled survival rate was 86% at 1 year. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Survival percentage 86 [59, 98] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities · 5 years, School, multiple-surface permanent posterior teeth, 5 years The pooled survival rate was 77% at 5 years. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. (2011) All outcomes | Survival percentage 77 [56, 92] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2012 All outcomes | All publications listed until 1 February 2010 | 29 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · Permanent posterior teeth with single-surface cavities · 1 review
- High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · Primary posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities · 1 review
- High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · Primary posterior teeth with single-surface cavities · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.