Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence vs usual care: Taking adherence
Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence showed no clear difference in taking adherence compared with standard care (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence vs standard care Taking adherence · solid organ transplant recipients Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence showed no clear difference in taking adherence compared with standard care (low certainty). Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence in solid organ transplant recipients (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.09 [0.95, 1.27] | 4 studies · 445 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence in solid organ transplant recipients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.