Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT): Death by AKI aetiology: surgical causes
Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in death by AKI aetiology: surgical causes compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) Death by AKI aetiology: surgical causes · AKI Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in death by AKI aetiology: surgical causes compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (low certainty). Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.65 [0.31, 1.36] | 3 studies · 365 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.