Question · asked by 1 review
Absorbable tacks plus absorbable sutures vs nonabsorbable tacks plus nonabsorbable sutures: Health‐related quality of life
- Population
- People with primary ventral or incisional hernia repair
- Intervention
- Absorbable tacks plus absorbable sutures
- Comparison
- nonabsorbable tacks plus nonabsorbable sutures
- Outcome
- Health‐related quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Absorbable tacks plus absorbable sutures vs nonabsorbable tacks plus nonabsorbable sutures Health‐related quality of life · People with primary ventral or incisional hernia repair The review found no eligible studies for this question. Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.