Question · asked by 1 review
Retinoic acid post‐consolidation therapy vs no further treatment: Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
- Population
- high‐risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous HSCT
- Intervention
- Retinoic acid post‐consolidation therapy
- Comparison
- no further treatment
- Outcome
- Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Retinoic acid postconsolidation therapy vs no further treatment Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · high‐risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous HSCT The review found no eligible studies for this question. Retinoic acid postconsolidation therapy for high‐risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Retinoic acid post‐consolidation therapy vs no further treatment Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · high‐risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous HSCT The review found no eligible studies for this question. Retinoic acid postconsolidation therapy for high‐risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010685.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retinoic acid postconsolidation therapy for high‐risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.