Question · asked by 1 review
CBT vs WAIT LIST: Adverse events (randomisation to post‐treatment)
- Population
- children and adolescents with anxiety disorders
- Intervention
- CBT
- Comparison
- WAIT LIST
- Outcome
- Adverse events (randomisation to post‐treatment)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CBT vs waitlist Adverse events (randomisation to post‐treatment) · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders The review found no eligible studies for this question. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CBT vs attention control · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders · 1 review
- CBT vs treatment · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders · 1 review
- CBT vs alternative treatment · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.