Question · asked by 1 review
Manual paper reminders vs other quality‐improvement (QI) interventions: Resource use
- Population
- Healthcare professionals
- Intervention
- Manual paper reminders
- Comparison
- other quality‐improvement (QI) interventions
- Outcome
- Resource use
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Manual paper reminders vs other quality‐improvement (QI) interventions Resource use · Healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses and dentists) Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 4235 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Manual paper reminders vs usual care · Healthcare professionals · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.